ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
m-EDI Measurement Using Low-Cost Spectrometric Sensors Based on Photodiode Arrays with Narrowband Color Filters: An Exploration of Alternative Calibration Methods.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies have highlighted the key role of lighting in regulating circadian rhythms and its impact on human health. Exposure to blue light, especially at specific times of day, is now quantified using the melanopic Equivalent Daylight Illuminance (m-EDI) parameter, defined in the CIE S 026 standard. This parameter is proportional to the integral, in the visible range, of the spectral power distribution and the melanopic sensitivity function, which peaks near 490 nm, and is similar to a Gaussian distribution. Low-cost spectrometric sensors using photodiode arrays and narrowband filters offer a cost-effective way to estimate m-EDI through a weighted sum of channel responses. However, due to inherent sensor variability, individual calibration is recommended. The standard approach involves multiple linear regression to fit the sensor's output to reference values using a set of test light sources. This method is easy to implement but depends heavily on the selection of calibration illuminants, which must outnumber the channels. This paper analyzes the sensitivity of this method to the sensor's spectral response and the choice of calibration sources. A revised calibration approach is proposed, selectively discarding channels to reduce deviations from the target response. Applied to several sensors, this method significantly improves calibration accuracy and robustness, reducing the RMS error for several test LEDs from 17.6 to 1.36 lux.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.