ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
3D Point Cloud Verification and Scatter Removal Using a Dual Camera/Projector Setup.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Low-Cost Optical-Inertial Point Cloud Acquisition and Sketch System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work investigates the properties of 3D imaging in turbid water in context of being able to precisely remove false 3D measurements that are a result of scattering. Such false measurements make object boundaries highly uncertain and limit the usefulness of 3D data. The work is motivated by a need for high-quality 3D image data for underwater robotics, also in turbid waters, where false 3D data can make 3D point cloud algorithms complex and unreliable. Basing ourselves on triangulation-based 3D imaging in turbid water, we show through first-principles analysis how a combination of certain camera/projector geometries and projected patterns allows for the reliable discrimination between true and false 3D measurements. We present an efficient (O1) algorithm capable of rapidly performing this discrimination. Through experiments, we show that we can provide a 50-100× better false positive rate than single-camera algorithms across relevant turbidities, whilst maintaining an almost zero false negative rate. This combination of camera hardware, projected patterns, and algorithms gives a significant robustness improvement of subsea 3D imaging systems, enabling robust and trustworthy 3D imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.