ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Study on Multi-Station Identification Technology of Lightning Electromagnetic Pulses (LEMPs) Based on Deep Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given the increasing threat of lightning to modern electronic systems and human activities, the accurate identification and classification of lightning electromagnetic pulses has become a critical research focus, prompting the present study. A dataset was established by collecting lightning electromagnetic signals generated by various types of lightning under diverse environmental conditions via the lightning location system of the Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Subsequently, A deep learning model integrating a convolutional neural network was developed for feature extraction and pattern recognition using the multi-station data. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model significantly improves LEMP identification accuracy (exceeding 97%) compared to existing single-station methods. Moreover, it effectively uncovers complex hidden features within the data, outperforming conventional approaches in both accuracy and robustness. In conclusion, the proposed deep learning model offers a reliable technical foundation for lightning monitoring and localization based on LEMP signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.