ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Intelligent Debonding Detection in GFRP Rock Bolts via Piezoelectric Time Reversal and CNN-SVM Model.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the challenge of detecting debonding damage in glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) rock bolt anchorage structures, this study proposes a time reversal detection method based on piezoelectric sensing and a Convolutional Neural Network-Support Vector Machine (CNN-SVM) model. Through COMSOL 6.1 numerical simulations and laboratory experiments, the influence of debonding length, location, and quantity on the characteristics of detection signals was investigated. The results indicate that an increase in debonding length leads to a rise in the amplitude of the focused signal, a reduction in the main peak frequency, and greater energy concentration around the main peak. Specifically, the amplitude increased by 10.96% (simulations) and 54.9% (experiments) for lengths from 0 to 1200 mm, while the peak frequency decreased by 3.43% (simulations) or increased slightly (experiments). When the debonding location changes, the amplitude remains stable, while the main peak frequency increases by 4.94% in simulations and shifts to higher frequencies experimentally, and the energy exhibits an increasing trend. An increase in the number of debonding points results in decreased amplitude, elevated main peak frequency, and more severe wave packet overlap. Multi-defect configurations reduced the amplitude by 16.68% (simulations) and 3% (experiments), with peak frequency increases of up to 3.35%. Based on these characteristics, a CNN-SVM evaluation model was constructed, using the wavelet time-frequency maps of experimental signals as input and the debonding state as output. The model achieved evaluation accuracy rates of 99%, 100%, and 100% under varying debonding lengths from 10 to 100 mm, different debonding positions, and increasing numbers of debonding defects, all exceeding 95%, thereby validating the reliability and high precision of the proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.