ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Self-Attention-Based Deep Learning for Missing Sensor Data Imputation in Real-Time Probe Card Monitoring.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-Modal Graph Attention for Bridge SHM Data Imputation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Optical Alignment Algorithms for Integrated Probe Cards in Photonic Wafer Testing.Micromachines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In industrial monitoring of semiconductor probe cards, real-time sensor data acquisition and processing are essential for anomaly detection and predictive maintenance. However, missing data resulting from possible sensor malfunctions present a significant challenge, compromising the integrity of subsequent analyses. The present study addresses this issue by applying and evaluating a state-of-the-art deep learning approach, the Self-Attention-based Imputation for Time Series model, to reconstruct corrupted signals from an industrial sensor network comprising accelerometers and microphones. A rigorous evaluation was conducted against traditional imputation methods and a powerful deep learning comparison method, the Bidirectional Recurrent Imputation for Time Series model, using a comprehensive set of time- and frequency-domain metrics. The results demonstrate that the self-attention model achieves competitive or superior accuracy, with an average improvement of 66% (with values ranging between 25% and 88%) in Mean Absolute Error over traditional methods especially in scenarios with extensive data loss, ensuring high fidelity in the reconstructed signals. The proposed analysis shows that the attention-based architecture offers a substantial practical advantage, completing training per epoch more than twenty times faster than the recurrent-based comparison method. This balance of high performance and computational efficiency makes the self-attention framework a robust and pragmatic solution to achieve data integrity in demanding monitoring and management systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.