Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41374569›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Self-Attention-Based Deep Learning for Missing Sensor Data Imputation in Real-Time Probe Card Monitoring.

Mehdi Bejani, Marco Mauri, Stefano Mariani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mehdi BejaniDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7668-3413
Marco MauriTechnoprobe, 23870 Cernusco Lombardone, Italy.ORCID 0009-0005-0553-4348
Stefano MarianiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5111-9800

Funding

European Union 101072491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In industrial monitoring of semiconductor probe cards, real-time sensor data acquisition and processing are essential for anomaly detection and predictive maintenance. However, missing data resulting from possible sensor malfunctions present a significant challenge, compromising the integrity of subsequent analyses. The present study addresses this issue by applying and evaluating a state-of-the-art deep learning approach, the Self-Attention-based Imputation for Time Series model, to reconstruct corrupted signals from an industrial sensor network comprising accelerometers and microphones. A rigorous evaluation was conducted against traditional imputation methods and a powerful deep learning comparison method, the Bidirectional Recurrent Imputation for Time Series model, using a comprehensive set of time- and frequency-domain metrics. The results demonstrate that the self-attention model achieves competitive or superior accuracy, with an average improvement of 66% (with values ranging between 25% and 88%) in Mean Absolute Error over traditional methods especially in scenarios with extensive data loss, ensuring high fidelity in the reconstructed signals. The proposed analysis shows that the attention-based architecture offers a substantial practical advantage, completing training per epoch more than twenty times faster than the recurrent-based comparison method. This balance of high performance and computational efficiency makes the self-attention framework a robust and pragmatic solution to achieve data integrity in demanding monitoring and management systems.

Indexed as

BRITSimputationmissing dataprobe cardreal-time monitoringSAITSSelf-Attention-based Imputation for Time Seriessensor data

Identifiers

PMID41374569
PMCPMC12694389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.