ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Time-Frequency Domain Diagnosis Network for ICE Fault Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Internal combustion engines (ICEs) are prone to faults such as abnormal injection pressure and valve clearance, but traditional diagnosis methods struggle with feature extraction and require large data volumes, limiting real-time applications. Deep learning approaches like CNN and LSTM have improved accuracy but often fail to capture both time and frequency domain features efficiently. This study proposes a Time-Frequency Domain Diagnosis Network (TFDN) that integrates a time-domain path (using residual networks and self-attention mechanisms for sequential feature extraction) and a frequency-domain path (using CNNs for spatial feature extraction). The model employs Swish activation functions and batch normalization to enhance training efficiency. Validated on a six-cylinder diesel engine with 12 fault types, TFDN achieved an accuracy of 98.12%~99.79% in full-load conditions, outperforming baselines like CNN, ResNet, and LSTM. Under mixed operating conditions, TFDN maintained high accuracy, precision, and recall, and demonstrated robustness with limited data (60%~70% accuracy at 5 samples per fault). TFDN effectively combines time-frequency features to improve diagnostic accuracy and stability, enabling real-time fault detection with reduced data dependency. It offers a practical solution for ICE condition monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.