ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Reconstruction of Respiratory Flow from an Impedance-Based Contactless Sensor System.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional respiratory monitoring is often invasive, while most non-contact technologies like radar or cameras are limited to estimating respiratory rate, failing to reconstruct the detailed waveform of the respiratory flow itself. This gap limits their clinical utility for advanced diagnostics. We introduce a novel system that bridges this gap by combining a contactless, impedance-based sensor (the Thoraxmonitor) with a dedicated machine learning framework to directly reconstruct the full respiratory flow signal. Operating at 433 MHz, the system's antenna array detects subtle changes in thoracic impedance, which are then translated into a quantitative flow signal by a Multilayer Perceptron Regressor. Based on data from 17 subjects benchmarked against a gold-standard flowmeter, our system accurately detected 98% of respiratory cycles. It achieved remarkable precision in timing respiratory events, with mean deviations of + 60 ms (±79 ms) for inspiration and + 50 ms (±63 ms) for expiration, making it suitable for time-critical applications. While a systematic bias in absolute tidal volume prediction currently limits inter-subject comparisons, the system excels at tracking relative intra-subject changes. Crucially, our model quantifies its own reliability, providing an intrinsic self-assessment mechanism. This work demonstrates a significant step beyond simple rate detection towards comprehensive, comfortable, and reliable respiratory analysis in clinical and everyday settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.