ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Clock-Face Sonography of the Glenoid Labrum: A Pictorial Technical Protocol for Patients Ineligible for MRI/MR Arthrography.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in the Evaluation of the Glenoid Labrum.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work presents a standardized 360-degree, clock-face ultrasonographic protocol for comprehensive static and dynamic assessment of the glenoid labrum. The protocol translates the arthroscopic clock-face orientation into ultrasound scanning windows, providing reproducible steps for each labral quadrant (12 to 12 o'clock) including patient positioning, transducer orientation, and dynamic maneuvers. By leveraging linear transducers with trapezoidal imaging and an optional convex transducer to bypass acoustic shadowing from the acromion and coracoid, all labral segments can be consistently visualized, while dynamic testing reveals subtle clefts, irregular margins, and medial displacement patterns. Clinically, this approach is particularly valuable for patients who cannot undergo MRI or MR arthrography (e.g., due to metallic implants, contrast allergy, claustrophobia or renal dysfunction) and in settings where MR/MRA is unavailable or impractical (sports medicine, urgent care, postoperative follow-up). The pictorial atlas and step-by-step checklists aim to support adoption in routine practice and to facilitate communication with surgeons through shared clock-face terminology. This protocol is not intended to replace MR arthrography for surgical planning; rather, when MRI/MRA cannot be performed or access is limited, it provides actionable, dynamic information that complements clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.