ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Tracing Microplastics in the Human Body: From Detection to Disease Mechanisms.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of human exposure to airborne micro-plastics and its potential effects utilizing bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- A novel non-invasive imaging technique for mapping microplastic accumulation and distribution in different organ systems of Indian major carpCurrent research in toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microplastics (MPs), defined as plastic particles < 5 mm diameter, have become a growing public health concern. First identified in the aquatic environment in 2004 and later in air samples in 2015, airborne MPs display wide variations in shape and size, with fibres being the most common. These physical characteristics, together with others such as median aerodynamic diameter, influence how deeply they penetrate and where they deposit within the respiratory tract. Recent studies have confirmed the presence of MPs in nasal lavage fluid, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, sputum, pleural fluid and lung tissue samples, with higher concentrations observed in older individuals, smokers and those with occupational exposure. Multiple polymer types have been identified, most frequently polypropylene, polyethylene and polyester. Experimental models demonstrate that MPs can induce inflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, microbiota alterations, fibrosis and carcinogenic changes, with toxicity generally increasing as particle size decreases. Despite the growing evidence of plastic toxicity, only a limited number of studies have examined MPs' influence on the respiratory system, focusing mostly on polyester spheres, rather than fibres, which dominate real-world exposure. Current findings suggest MPs contribute to several pathophysiological processes and may play a role in respiratory disease. However, further research is needed to clarify the underlying mechanisms, long-term consequences and clinical relevance of these emerging pollutants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.