ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Structural Effects of Concrete Creep in a Prestressed Balanced Cantilever Bridge Based on Classical and Fractional Rheological Models.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper discusses the phenomenon of concrete creep and its impact on bridge structures, with particular emphasis on the mechanical models used to describe it. Classical rheological models, such as the Maxwell and Kelvin-Voigt, along with their generalized and fractional extensions incorporating fractional-order derivatives, are presented. These models differ in their complexity and in the accuracy of fit to laboratory test results. The use of non-classical, fractional-order rheological models (the fractional Kelvin-Voigt model and the fractional Zener model) enables better model fitting. The paper further describes methods for estimating creep effects in bridge design. The most popular is the effective modulus method, which is easy to implement but does not account for the load application history. More accurate approaches (e.g., Trost, Bažant, incremental method according to linear elasticity theory) are based on iterative procedures and require advanced computer implementation. The consequences of creep in bridge structures are highlighted: geometric (changes in elevation) and static (redistribution of internal forces and support reactions, changes in sectional stresses). These effects are particularly important in structures erected in stages, such as bridges built using the balanced cantilever method. The analytical section presents the influence of various creep models on changes in static quantities for a three-span prestressed bridge constructed by the cantilever method. The importance of proper selection of the creep model for the accuracy of engineering calculations and for the correct assessment of the long-term behavior of the structure is emphasized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.