ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comprehensive Review on Mechanical Performance of Concrete Reinforced with Fibers and Waste Materials.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Review and Experimental Study on the Performance of Rubberised Concrete Under Combined Freeze-Thaw and Sulphate Attack.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Concrete is one of the most important and most widely used materials for construction activities around the world. However, it has inherent deficiencies, e.g., brittleness, low impact resistance, low tensile strength, low fire resistance, low durability, and lower resistance to crack formation. Fibers and waste materials of different types are added as partial replacement of cement and aggregates in concrete to improve performance properties and reduce environmental pollution. In the present study, a thorough review of the use of various types of fibers with high and low elastic moduli in concrete to improve mechanical performance and reduce environmental pollution issues has been conducted. This review paper also provides comprehensive information on the different types of waste materials, e.g., biodegradable and non-biodegradable, which are used in concrete. The use of waste materials in concrete reduces the amount of waste sent to landfill and, in addition, improves some mechanical properties of concrete. This review is aimed at evaluating and understanding the strengths and weaknesses of fiber-reinforced concrete by using SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis. Moreover, this study also concluded that carbon fiber-reinforced concrete proves to be stronger and more durable but more expensive than other fibers. An ideal percentage of natural origin fibers used in concrete can greatly improve the mechanical performance. This study also discussed that waste from polymeric materials can be used in concrete as a partial replacement of cement and other components, e.g., coarse aggregates. It can be inferred that the optimum content of fibers that gives effective results is about 1%, and the reinforcement of concrete with different varieties of wastes as a replacement for fine aggregates should not be more than 2%. Parametric optimization of fiber content will be necessary for the best possible combination of performance properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.