ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Effects of Three Types of Movements of Nickel-Titanium Instruments on Root Canal Preparation: Analysis by Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of endodontics leads to increasingly innovative techniques, which improve mechanical root canal preparation. Endostar E3 Azure (Poldent Co., Warsaw, Poland) is a nickel-titanium file, which can be used in rotary, reciprocal, and optimum torque reverse (OTR) movements. The aim of this study was to assess canal transportation (CT), canal-centering ability (CCA), and wall thickness reduction (WTR) after the use of Endostar E3 Azure files in these three movements. In total, 24 two-canal artificial teeth were used, which were divided into three groups, depending on the applied movement (n = 16 canals). Each canal was initially prepared manually and then instrumented with Endostar E3 Azure files using rotary, reciprocal, or OTR movements. Cone-beam computed tomography was performed before and after canal preparation. The root wall thickness was measured at 3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm from the radiological apex and CT, CCA, and WTR were calculated. Reciprocal movement resulted in significantly better outcomes in canal-centering ability (CCA = 0.57) compared with rotary movement (CCA = 0.27) in the middle part of the canal. The wall thickness was significantly reduced in the rotary group: 0.21, 0.19, and 0.13; in the reciprocal group: 0.09, 0.08, and 0.1; and in the OTR group: 0.11, 0.15, and 0.17 at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the apex, respectively. Moreover, rotary movement caused a statistically greater reduction in wall thickness in the apical and middle area compared to other groups. Endostar E3 Azure files significantly reduce the thickness of the root wall along its entire length, which may indicate the effective removal of infected tissue. The use of OTR movement did not affect the analyzed parameters negatively, and it is a safe option which combines the advantageous features of rotary and reciprocal movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.