ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Thermo-Responsive Hydrogel Swelling: Integrating Constitutive Models with Sparse Experimental Data.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Smart Nanodelivery Systems for Immunometabolic Modulation in Osteoarthritis.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) hydrogels are temperature-sensitive materials whose swelling is difficult to predict near the gel collapse temperature (GCT). A physics-informed neural network (PINN) was developed in which a stabilized free-energy model is embedded and sparse data for free and uniaxially constrained swelling are assimilated. Across datasets, the PINN reduces test RMSE by 44% at low crosslink density (Nν = 0.0035) and by 65% at higher density (Nν = 0.02), with coverage inside ±RMSE bands improving from 61.9% to 76.2% for free swelling at Nν = 0.0035. Under constraint, test relative error decreases from 19.95% to 11.86% (n = 1) and from 9.19% to 5.90% (n = 3), while preserving thermodynamic stability. The method sharpens the transition slope near the gel-collapse temperature and narrows prediction intervals without overfitting, capturing cold-regime plateaus and hot-side tails more faithfully. The framework integrates governing equations with data to deliver accurate swelling and stress predictions using only eight anchors and thirteen held-out points per case. These results position PINNs as a reliable surrogate for designing thermo-responsive hydrogels in soft actuators and biomedical systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.