ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Compressive Strength-Based Classification of Eco-Friendly Concretes Using Machine Learning Models.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of compressive strength in eco-friendly concretes, where part of the cement is replaced with recycled glass powder, remains a fundamental challenge for sustainable construction. This study evaluates and compares the performance of five machine learning models-Naïve Bayes, Random Forest, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN)-for classifying the compressive strength of concretes with different mix designs and curing ages. The dataset includes 846 experimental samples produced at the School of Civil Engineering of UPM between 2004 and 2019. The results showed that Naïve Bayes and Random Forest achieved the highest accuracy and generalizability, confirming that the incorporation of glass powder does not introduce significant data instability and can serve as a viable and sustainable substitute of cement. The Decision Tree model provided the greatest interpretability, enabling insight into the influence of mixture parameters, while SVM and k-NN were primarily effective in extreme strength categories. Overall, the findings demonstrated that probabilistic and ensemble learning methods outperform deterministic and proximity-based algorithms in classifying materials with high compositional variability. This work reinforces the potential of artificial intelligence as a non-destructive, reliable, and scalable tool for optimizing the performance of low carbon concretes and promoting sustainable materials engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.