ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comparative Study of Machine Learning for Predicting Compressive Strength in Oyster Shell Cementitious Composites.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Performance Analysis of Boosting-Based Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Compressive Strength of Biochar-Cementitious Composites.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Annual oyster production in southern Korea reaches about 300,000 tons, generating an equivalent amount of waste oyster shells. Most are illegally dumped or stockpiled along coastlines, causing serious environmental issues. This study utilized machine learning to predict the compressive strength of oyster shell cementitious composites. A total of 336 datasets were used, including 189 experimental results and 147 from published literature. Input variables were water-to-cement ratio (W/C), silica fume, blast furnace slag, superplasticizer content, and curing conditions. Algorithm selection compared the performance of Ridge Regression, Support Vector Regression, Artificial Neural Network, and Random Forest (RF), with RF exhibiting the highest predictive performance (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.