ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Assessment of the Potential for Producing Geopolymer-Based Granulates as a Substitute for Natural Aggregates.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Alkali-Activated Granulated Aggregates from Low-Quality Fly Ash and Basalt Dust: Effect of Sodium Silicate/NaOH Activator Chemistry and Accelerated Carbonation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents the development and evaluation of a technology for producing geopolymer-based granulates, which act as sustainable substitutes for natural aggregates by utilizing waste materials. The technology is demonstrated to be energy-efficient compared to other manufactured aggregate processes (such as sintering), as it relies on a cold-bonding process and achieves self-hardening at room temperature. The granulation of geopolymer materials using an intensive counter-current mixer represents an innovative solution in the field of producing substitutes for natural aggregates. Coal fly ash (CFA) was used as the primary aluminosilicate precursor, with composite regrind from decommissioned wind turbine blades (CR) and steelmaking dust (SD) tested as additives. Reactive solids and alkaline activator liquids were mixed and granulated in a single operation using an intensive counter-current mixer; moistening and surface powdering were applied to improve granule sphericity. The granules were cold-cured at room temperature and characterized after 28 days by grain size distribution, crushing resistance, water absorption, abrasion (micro-Deval), SEM/EDS and leaching tests. The results indicate that the additives significantly improved the mechanical performance: PM + PK granules reached crushing strengths > 6 MPa, while CFA + SD granules reached > 11 MPa, exceeding many commercial lightweight aggregates (such as LECA or Lytag), as detailed in the paper. The CFA + CR granulates exhibited a compact microstructure and the effective immobilization of several heavy metals, whereas the CFA + DS samples demonstrated the excessive leaching of Cr, Pb and Mo. The process achieved a high solid-to-liquid ratio (>2.0), reducing activator consumption. Composite regrind is recommended as a promising additive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.