ArticleNutrients2025
Exploring Vitamin D Trends Through Big Data Analysis.
Article in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Vitamin D and Older Adults: To Supplement or Not to Supplement?Drugs & aging · 2026Review
- Construction and validation of a risk prediction model for vitamin D deficiency in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesBig data analysis has revolutionized medical research, making it possible to analyze vast amounts of data and gain valuable insights that were previously impossible to obtain. Our knowledge of the characteristics of vitamin D sufficiency is primarily based on data from a limited number of observations, generally spanning a few years at most.
methodsHere at the Medical Faculty of the University of Debrecen, the big data approach has allowed us to analyze trends in vitamin D status using nearly 60,000 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration results from 2000 onwards.
resultsApart from analyzing the well-known phenomenon of seasonality in 25(OH)D concentration, we observed a trend in test requests, which increased from a few hundred in 2000 to almost 10,000 in 2020. Of particular interest is the change in the gender gap in test requests. In previous years, test requests were primarily from women, but by the end of the analysis period, a significant number of requests were from men as well. Since the data set includes all age groups, we analyzed 25(OH)D concentration for incremental age sets of five years, from a few months to 100 years old. The prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency (<75 nmol/L) was clearly demarcated among various years of observation, age groups, sexes, and seasons. Our data was particularly valuable for analyzing the effect of the methodology used for 25(OH)D determination. Three different methodologies were used during the study period, and clear, statistically significant bias was observed.
conclusionsOur results clearly demonstrate the effect of the methodology used to determine 25(OH)D concentrations on vitamin D status, explicitly highlighting the urgent need to standardize the various platforms used to measure this important analyte and its consequences for public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.