Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41373987›Full record

ArticleNutrients2025

From Policy to Plate: Implications of 2025 U.S. Federal Policy Changes on School Meals.

Lindsey Reed, Megan Elsener Lott, Mary Story

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lindsey ReedHealthy Eating Research, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Megan Elsener LottHealthy Eating Research, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Mary StoryHealthy Eating Research, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

School meals are a cornerstone of the United States' nutrition safety net for children from low-income families, providing nearly 30 million lunches daily. However, recent U.S. policy actions may limit access to school meals for children who need them most. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act changed eligibility requirements to limit participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Medicaid. School-age children enrolled in SNAP and Medicaid are automatically enrolled in school meal programs. Limiting participation in SNAP and Medicaid has the potential to significantly impact children's ability to receive nutritious school meals at low or no cost, will make it harder for schools to participate in community eligibility provision, and will increase the administrative burden on school staff and parents.

Indexed as

Food AssistanceFood ServicesNutrition PolicySchoolsChildHumansMedicaidPovertyUnited Statesdirect certificationfree and reduced-price lunchNational School Lunch Programschool-age childrenSchool Breakfast ProgramU.S. food policy

Identifiers

PMID41373987
PMCPMC12694541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.