ArticleNutrients2025
Association Between Over-the-Counter Magnesium Supplement Use and Health Outcomes in Veterans with Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure.
Article in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals with heart failure (HF) are at increased risk of magnesium deficiency. Magnesium supplements are widely available and being used without clear evidence of efficacy in HF.
methodsWe emulated a target trial to assess the association between magnesium supplements and adverse outcomes in U.S. veterans with newly diagnosed HF. Eligible patients were outpatients who received ambulatory care in the Veterans Health Administration between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2020. Veterans with a hospitalization within 30 days prior to the eligible date, previous magnesium supplement or replacement use, or end-stage renal disease were ineligible for the trial. Initial self-reported magnesium supplement use (measured at eligible date) was identified in medical records using natural language processing and then checked repeatedly to confirm continuous use. The outcome was all-cause hospitalization or death. Patients were followed for up to five years from the eligible date and were censored if they changed from the assigned treatment strategy or initiated prescribed magnesium replacement. We applied inverse probability treatment weighting and Cox's regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), with sensitivity analyses in patients surviving ≥ 6 months and those with continuous documentation of magnesium supplement use.
resultsWe enrolled 9900 magnesium supplement users and 9900 matched non-users. In the weighted cohort (mean age 72.6 years; 12.6% African American; 3.4% women; median follow-up 0.7 years), users had significantly better survival in both primary and sensitivity analyses (HR in primary analysis: 0.81 [0.77-0.86],
conclusionsmagnesium supplement use was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality or hospitalization among veterans with HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.