ArticleNutrients2025
Association Between Exposure to Age Discrimination and Nutritional Risk: Findings from a Nationwide Sample of Older Adults in South Korea.
Article in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAgeism and age-related discrimination are growing public health concerns that can have detrimental effects on the health of older adults. However, their association with nutritional health remains unexplored. This study explored the association between age discrimination and nutritional risk among older adults in Republic of Korea.
methodsThis study is a cross-sectional analysis of the 2023 National Survey of Older Korean. 9951 adults aged ≥ 65 years from the 2023 National Survey of Older Koreans. Age discrimination was assessed based on the reported experiences in six everyday settings: public transportation; commercial facilities; public institutions; healthcare facilities; workplaces; and family. Nutritional status was measured using the Nutrition Screening Initiative and categorized into low; moderate; and high nutritional risk groups. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to determine the association between age discrimination and nutritional risk and estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsThe mean age of participants was 74.0 years. Among the participants, 73.7% reported no age discrimination, whereas 15.4%, 6.0%, and 4.9% experienced age discrimination in one; two; and three or more settings, respectively. After adjusting for socio-demographic characteristics and health factors, compared to individuals who did not experience age discrimination, those who experienced discrimination in one, two, or three or more dimensions had 1.40-fold (95% CI: 1.17-1.69), 1.46-fold (95% CI: 1.13-1.89), and 1.89-fold (95% CI: 1.44-2.48) higher odds of being at high nutritional risk, respectively.
conclusionAge discrimination exposure may be a risk factor for poor nutritional health in older adults. Policy efforts are needed to reduce age-related discrimination and stigmatization and promote equitable conditions for healthy aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.