ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Polystyrene Nanoplastics in Human Gastrointestinal Models-Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Toxicity.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developmental Environmental Chronotoxicity by Polystyrene Nanoplastics Exacerbates High-Fat Diet-Induced Pediatric MAFLD Through Circadian Disruption and Mitochondrial Dysfunction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Microplastics and Nanoplastics in the Human Diet: Sources of Exposure, Bioavailability, Toxicokinetics, and Systemic Health Effects.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bacteria-nanoplastic interactions: mechanisms, ecological consequences, and advances in biodegradation technologies.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Mulberroside A attenuates HMolecular medicine reports · 2026Article
- Developing a New Approach Methodology Framework to Assess Biological Responses to Nanoplastics: Insights from Polystyrene and Biodegradable Particles.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Microplastics in food production systems: Sources, exposure pathways, and gastrointestinal health effects.Current research in food science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plastic pollution is a growing environmental and health issue due to the increasing presence of micro- and nanoplastics in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-NPs) are among the most extensively studied because of their wide occurrence, physicochemical stability, and availability for laboratory research. Their nanoscale size enables interaction with biological systems at the molecular level, promoting internalization, intracellular trafficking, and potential bioaccumulation. This review summarizes current knowledge on the cellular effects and molecular mechanisms of PS-NPs, particularly in human gastrointestinal models. The gastrointestinal tract is a primary route of nanoplastic exposure, where PS-NPs can cross epithelial barriers, interact with immune and epithelial cells, and disturb cellular homeostasis. Once internalized, PS-NPs can induce oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and dysregulation of autophagy, leading to alterations in lipid and glucose metabolism. Excessive synthesis of reactive oxygen species may trigger DNA damage, activate the ATM/ATR-p53 signaling pathway, and impair DNA repair mechanisms, thereby contributing to genomic instability. Emerging evidence also shows that PS-NPs can interact with ion channels, affecting calcium homeostasis, membrane potential, and cell viability. Overall, these findings highlight the complex and multifaceted toxicity of PS-NPs at the cellular level and underscore the need for further research to assess the long-term risks of nanoplastic exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.