ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Minimal Residual Disease Detection: Bridging Molecular and Clinical Strategies for Recurrence Prevention in Gynecologic Cancers.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bioactive Anti-Inflammatory Compounds and Therapeutic Strategies for Promoting Resolution.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gynecologic cancers remain a major global health burden, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, with high incidence and mortality rates around 45-50%. The detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is transforming the management of recurrence risk in gynecologic cancers through highly sensitive molecular technologies. MRD encompasses small populations of residual cancer cells or post-treatment molecular traces but remain undetectable by conventional methods. Its detection relies on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and advanced next-generation sequencing (NGS), with ctDNA-based MRD assays having sensitivity levels between 85% and over 99%. Other technologies, such as liquid biopsies and digital PCR, are also in development. MRD status has demonstrated high predictors of recurrence and survival with positive MRD strongly associated with poor outcomes and negative MRD indicates sustained remission. However, MRD detection faces significant limitations, such as tumor heterogeneity, inconstant ctDNA levels, technical issues of false-negative results, and limited clinical accessibility. Therefore, this review presents current evidence regarding the molecular detection of MRD in gynecologic malignancies and assesses its prognostic and predictive relevance. Ultimately, MRD continuous integration into clinical practice offers a promising modality to enable early relapse detection, more precise therapeutic decision-making, and the improvement of personalized medicine access to gynecologic cancers worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.