ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Ovarian Tumor Biomarkers: Correlation Between Tumor Type and Marker Expression, and Their Role in Guiding Therapeutic Strategies.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative Inflammatory Markers as Predictors of Ovarian Tumor Malignancy: A Retrospective Diagnostic Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Refractory Hypoglycemia in a Woman With Cirrhosis and a Large Pelvic Mass: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ovarian tumors constitute a complex and heterogeneous group of neoplasms, encompassing both benign and highly malignant lesions. Accurate diagnosis and classification of ovarian tumor types are crucial for the personalization of therapeutic strategies and have a significant impact on patient prognosis. This review presents the current state of knowledge regarding both classical and novel biomarkers, with particular emphasis on their diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic value. Traditional markers, such as CA-125 and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), remain central to clinical diagnostics; however, their limitations highlight the need for more sensitive and specific approaches. Emerging biomarkers, including microRNAs (miRNA), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and advanced panels integrating transcriptomic, proteomic, and genomic data, offer the potential for earlier detection, improved disease monitoring, and assessment of treatment response. Despite these advances, major challenges persist, particularly those associated with the heterogeneity of ovarian tumors, the high costs of testing, lack of standardization, and unequal access to diagnostic methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.