Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41373835›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Plasma Extracellular Vesicles as Liquid Biopsies for Glioblastoma: Biomarkers, Subpopulation Enrichment, and Clinical Translation.

Abudumijiti Aibaidula, Ali Gharibi Loron, Samantha M Bouchal, Megan M J Bauman, Hyo Bin You, Fabrice Lucien, Ian F Parney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Extracellular vesicles: Navigating new frontiers in glioblastoma therapy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abudumijiti AibaidulaDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA.
Ali Gharibi LoronDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9103-610X
Samantha M BouchalDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA.
Megan M J BaumanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA.
Hyo Bin YouDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-0019-8460
Fabrice LucienDepartment of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6149-345X
Ian F ParneyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9702-8047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, has a median survival of 14-15 months despite aggressive treatment. Monitoring relies on MRI, but differentiating tumor progression from pseudo-progression or radiation necrosis remains difficult. Plasma extracellular vesicles (EVs) are emerging as promising non-invasive biomarkers due to their molecular cargos and accessibility. This review evaluates studies that specifically isolated plasma EVs for molecular profiling in GBM diagnosis and monitoring. Biomarkers (miRNA, RNA, DNA, proteins), EV characterization methods, and advancements in enriching tumor-derived EV subpopulations and assessing their diagnostic and prognostic potential are highlighted. Plasma EVs carry diverse cargos, including miRNAs (e.g., miR-21, miR-15b-3p), mRNAs (e.g., EGFRvIII), circRNAs, and proteins (e.g., CD44, GFAP). Composite molecular signatures have achieved sensitivities of 87-100% and specificities of 73-100% for GBM diagnosis. Tumor-derived EVs, enriched using techniques like SEC-CD44 immunoprecipitation, microfluidic platforms, or 5-ALA-induced PpIX fluorescence, enhance biomarker detection. Non-tumor-derived EVs may also reflect GBM's systemic effects. Challenges include EV heterogeneity, non-EV contamination, and variable biomarker expression across studies. Plasma-EV-based liquid biopsies offer significant potential for GBM monitoring, with advanced enrichment methods improving tumor-specific biomarker detection. Standardizing isolation protocols and validating biomarkers in larger cohorts are critical for clinical translation.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsExtracellular VesiclesGlioblastomaHumansLiquid BiopsyMicroRNAsBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsextracellular vesiclesglioblastomaliquid biopsyplasma biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID41373835
PMCPMC12691731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.