ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Benchmarking Cost-Effective DNA Extraction Kits for Diverse Metagenomic Samples.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficient recovery and DNA extraction for algae-associated microbial communities.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extraction of high-quality microbial DNA remains a critical bottleneck in metagenomic research. Environmental samples often produce fragmented DNA and are prone to contaminations that interfere with downstream sequencing, while widely used commercial kits can be prohibitively expensive. Therefore, systematic evaluation of cost-effective alternatives is essential to support large-scale metagenomic studies. In this work, we benchmarked eight commercial DNA extraction kits from Magen, SkyGen, and Sileks against Qiagen reference kits. Four representative sample types were analyzed: freshwater, seafloor sediments, Pacific oyster (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.