ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Ex Vivo Gene and Cell Therapy in Hematopoietic Stem Cells.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gene therapy for hereditary hematological disorders: From clinical breakthroughs to future horizons.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Review
- Oncogenesis as an Adverse Effect of Gene Replacement Therapy in Hematopoietic Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Advances in Therapies for Mucopolysaccharidoses.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Reprogramming innate immunity through viral interference: A double-edged strategy for enhancing and containing gene therapies.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Review
- Strategies for the Prevention and Control of Complications of Pathological Myopia: A Systematic Review of Research Progress from Axial Control to Target Organ Protection.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Precision Genome Engineering in Human Disease: Expanding Therapeutic Roles of CRISPR Technologies.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ex vivo cell and gene therapy is a prospective approach to treatment of genetic diseases. To date, one of the most prevalent examples of genetically engineered cell therapies is hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). This mini review is focused on HSPC therapy methods that have been approved for medical use. Most gene therapy methods rely on the lentiviral integration of the gene into the target cell genome, as lentiviruses are extremely effective, particularly in transduction of non-dividing cells. In this constantly evolving field, it is important to find the balance between safety concerns and efficiency. Analyzing cases of several diseases, for which ex vivo gene therapy was developed, we strive to understand which factors are crucial to success and what the potential drawbacks are. Although in general, viral gene integration demonstrates a considerable therapeutic effect, it has oncogenic potential. Development of self-inactivating vectors was a breakthrough in regard to safety, but the possibility of oncogenesis remains, and strict analysis of integration sites is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.