Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41373585›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Current Knowledge About Aprocitentan in Hypertension.

Emilie Mathilde Bank-Mikkelsen, Daniela Grimm, Markus Wehland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Special Issue: Recent Research on Hypertension and Related Complications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emilie Mathilde Bank-MikkelsenDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
Daniela GrimmDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4991-3105
Markus WehlandDepartment of Microgravity and Translational Regenerative Medicine, Otto von Guericke University, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8160-859X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension (HT) is the leading contributor to the global burden of disease and overall mortality and is expected to increase due to such factors as increased life expectancy and rising obesity rates. Although HT significantly contributes to cardiovascular disease, it is also considered one of the most modifiable risk factors. Aprocitentan (ACT) is a newly developed orally administered dual endothelin receptor antagonist. This review aims to give an overview of the current knowledge regarding ACT in HT, focusing on its pharmacological mechanisms and therapeutic potential. We conducted a search in the PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov databases using the search terms "hypertension", "aprocitentan", high blood pressure" and "cardiovascular disease", as well as all their permutations. Both human and animal studies have demonstrated significant blood pressure reductions within 14 days of administration, with 25 mg identified as the most effective dose and no severe adverse effects. Moreover, ACT was compatible with other antihypertensive agents, demonstrating synergistic or additive effects in some cases. Since HT is frequently associated with comorbidities and ACT targets a different pathway than the existing antihypertensive drugs, ACT may play a pivotal role in the management of resistant hypertension.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsEndothelin Receptor AntagonistsHypertensionPyrimidinesSulfonamidesAnimalsBlood PressureHumansAntihypertensive AgentsaprocitentanEndothelin Receptor AntagonistsPyrimidinesSulfonamidesaprocitentandual endothelin receptor antagonisthypertension

Identifiers

PMID41373585
PMCPMC12692031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.