ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Exploratory Covalent Docking of Michael-Acceptor Natural Products at Reactive Cysteines in Cancer Tyrosine Kinases.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Curcumin Between Pleiotropic Potential and Translational Constraints.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tyrosine kinases (TKs) and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) contain reactive cysteines that can be exploited by targeted covalent inhibitors. In this exploratory computational study, we asked whether selected natural-product-like (NP-like) electrophiles bearing Michael-acceptor (MA) motifs could adopt geometries consistent with covalent approaches to these cysteines, in a manner analogous to approved covalent TKIs. Using AutoDockFR with cysteine-centered grids and explicit side-chain flexibility, we performed pocket-focused, within-receptor covalent docking for EGFR, VEGFR2/KDR, PDGFRβ (via PDGFRα surrogate), BTK, CDK7, and CDK12. Reference inhibitors (osimertinib-EGFR, ibrutinib-BTK, THZ1-CDK7, and THZ531-CDK12) reproduced the expected geometries and served as internal controls. NP-like electrophiles (parthenolide, withaferin A, celastrol, and curcumin as a low-reactivity geometry probe) displayed pocket-compatible orientations in several targets, particularly EGFR and BTK, suggesting feasible pre-reaction alignment toward the reactive cysteine. Although no quantitative affinity was inferred, the consistent geometric feasibility supports their potential as structural templates for covalent-binding natural scaffolds. These results provide a qualitative, structure-based rationale for further chemoproteomic and enzymatic validation of NP-derived or hybrid compounds as potential leads in cancer therapy, expanding covalent chemical space beyond existing synthetic scaffolds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.