ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Exploring African Community Attitudes Towards Mental Illness in Australia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMental illness is often stigmatized across various cultural groups, yet there is limited understanding of African communities' perceptions and beliefs regarding mental health. One reason for this disparity could be the lack of culturally appropriate tools to assess attitudes towards mental illness in African populations. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the 40-item Community Attitudes towards the Mentally Ill (CAMI) scale within African communities in Australia.
designThis study employed a quantitative, cross-sectional, and descriptive approach, using a self-administered survey to assess the psychometric properties of the CAMI scale among African Australian individuals. Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate internal consistency.
methodA convenience sample of 110 individuals from various African community organizations in Australia was recruited. The original English version of the CAMI scale was used to assess attitudes towards mental illness.
resultsCronbach's alpha for the overall scale was 0.717, indicating acceptable consistency. The Authoritarianism sub-scale had a lower reliability of 0.424, which is below the acceptable threshold of 0.70. The other sub-scales had a better internal consistency, with 0.730 for Benevolence, 0.724 for Ideology, and 0.627 for Social Restrictiveness, though the latter still lacked the ideal 0.70.
conclusionsThe CAMI scale has been demonstrated to be a reliable and culturally appropriate tool for assessing African communities' attitudes towards mental illness in Australia. By identifying negative attitudes, this tool can be used to inform health education and awareness programs that address misconceptions about mental illness. Such programs could encourage early health-seeking behaviors among migrants, facilitating early identification and intervention, and ultimately improving health outcomes by reducing the burden of mental illness. This study is significant as it provides a culturally appropriate tool to assess mental health attitudes in African communities, informing the development of appropriate strategies to promote early help-seeking behaviors and reduce stigma, thus improving mental health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.