ArticleHealth promotion practice2025
The CalFresh Fruit and Vegetable EBT Pilot Project: A Model for Direct Nutrition Incentive Integration for SNAP Participants in the Retail Grocery Store Setting.
Article in Health promotion practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using the Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS) for nutrition incentive programs in the food retail context.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026Article
- The CalFresh Fruit and Vegetable EBT Pilot Project: A Model for Direct Nutrition Incentive Integration for SNAP Participants in the Retail Grocery Store Setting.Health promotion practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Economic Research Service, 13.5% of U.S. households experienced food insecurity in 2023, representing a notable increase from the previous year and emphasizing the urgent need for innovative enhancements to food assistance programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). This paper presents a case study of the CalFresh Fruit and Vegetable EBT (Electronic Benefit Transfer) Pilot Project, a pioneering initiative in California that enables SNAP recipients to earn a dollar-for-dollar rebate, up to $60 per month, on fresh fruits and vegetables purchased at participating grocery stores and farmers markets. Incentives earned through this program were automatically credited to recipients' EBT accounts and could be redeemed for any SNAP-eligible foods at authorized USDA Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) retailers. At its launch, this was the only program in the U.S. to integrate nutrition incentives directly into SNAP EBT accounts for use at grocery stores. The Pilot Project achieved high satisfaction among both retailers and participants, resulting in nearly $18 million in incentives earned by approximately 93,000 SNAP recipients. This case study highlights key learnings and implications for practice, policy, and research and explores opportunities to replicate this model in other states and communities. Integrating nutrition incentives into the SNAP EBT system represents a promising strategy to promote healthier food choices and reduce food insecurity nationwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.