ArticleJournal of periodontology2026
aMMP-8 self-testing and self-administered questionnaires for periodontitis screening: A diagnostic trial in a Chinese population.
Article in Journal of periodontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLimited awareness, clinical barriers, and persistent high prevalence make large-scale detection of periodontitis challenging, creating demand for simple, affordable, and population-level screening strategies outside traditional dental settings. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of self-test activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) for identifying periodontitis and assesses the feasibility of a fully self-reported screening model compared with models based on quantitative aMMP-8 point-of-care test (POCT) results.
methodsIn this cross-sectional diagnostic study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of three index tests: self-performed or POCT aMMP-8 alone on an oral rinse sample, or in combination with a questionnaire. Periodontitis status was determined using radiographic bone loss according to the 2017 classification, as stages III-IV or stages II-IV. Binary logistic regression models were developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regularization and 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.
resultsA total of 566 participants were included, and 41.7% were diagnosed with stages II-IV periodontitis. Both self-test and quantitative aMMP-8 results were significantly associated with periodontitis. In univariable models, self-test aMMP-8 showed lower AUROC than quantitative results. However, adding questionnaires and demographic factors in multivariable models improved the diagnostic performance of self-test and minimized the gap between the two. The final multivariable models showed comparable performance for self-test aMMP-8-based (AUROC = 0.955) and quantitative aMMP-8-based (AUROC = 0.957) models in stages III-IV periodontitis prediction, with similar results for stages II-IV periodontitis.
conclusionThis study showed that a self-test aMMP-8-based multivariable diagnostic model can perform similarly to a quantitative aMMP-8 POCT-based one. Once further developed and validated, a fully self-reported diagnostic model can provide a potential tool for periodontitis screening. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study examined whether a simple, self-administered mouth rinse test could aid in identifying individuals with advanced gum disease. Over 550 adults participated, and approximately 42% were found to have severe gum disease. We discovered that the self-test alone was less accurate than a more detailed machine-based quantitative reading. However, when combined with a questionnaire about dental health and basic personal information, the accuracy of detection improved a lot. These combined methods performed well and were similar to using only the machine results. Our results suggest that a simple screening approach, which includes a self-test, a questionnaire, and personal details, could be an inexpensive and easy-to-use tool for community health screenings to identify severe gum disease early. Further research is needed to test this method in various populations and confirm its effectiveness in real-world settings for identifying gum disease and promoting early dental care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.