ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
A comparison of allied healthcare versus no allied healthcare on participation, fatigue, physical functioning and health-related quality of life for patients with persistent complaints after a COVID-19 infection.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of allied healthcare MATERIALS AND
methodsData from the ParaCOV cohort (allied healthcare,
resultsPatients receiving allied healthcare were older (49.2 vs. 41.2 years), less often female (63.3% vs. 70.1%), had higher BMI (28.2 vs. 26.1), smoked less frequently (5.0% vs. 9.0%), had more comorbidities (49.2% vs. 41.9%), and lower baseline anxiety and depression scores compared to those not receiving allied healthcare. For participation, ATEs after 6 and 12 months were respectively -2.62 (95%CI: -4.39; -0.86) and -1.68 (95%CI: -4.81;1.45), with BTGDs of 4.7% and 1.8% favoring the control. For fatigue, ATEs were 1.72 (95%CI: -0.14; 3.58) and 0.97 (95%CI: -1.48; 3.41), with BTGDs of 6.5% and 3.7% favoring the control. For physical functioning, ATEs were 5.75 (95% CI: 4.42; 7.09) and 6.36 (95%CI: 4.84; 7.88), with BTGDs of 1.4% and 2.2% favoring allied healthcare. For health-related quality of life, ATEs were 0.017 (95%CI: -0.008; 0.0044) and 0.033 (95%CI: 0.011; 0.054).
conclusionsPatients with persistent complaints after a COVID-19 infection showed significantly lower participation after 6 months, higher health-related quality of life after 12 months, and better physical functioning after 6 and 12 months of allied healthcare, however, BTGDs were not clinically relevant. Study limitations warrant cautious results interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.