ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
Detection of the Linac Jaw face angle misalignment using high energy electron beam symmetry.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Detection of the Linac Jaw face angle misalignment using high energy electron beam symmetry.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo demonstrate the usage of a high energy electron beam symmetry measured at different collimator angles to detect jaws face angle misalignments on Varian TrueBeam linear accelerators (linac) during acceptance and commissioning processes.
methodsDuring the linac acceptance, all beams were steered to a symmetric shape with the gantry and collimator at 0°. We noted that the symmetries of higher energies electrons (e.g., 16 MeV, 20 MeV) changed over 2% when measured with the collimator at 90° and/or 270° for two linacs commissioned within 5-months of each other. Misaligned applicators were ruled out as the cause of this issue. Eventually, this was traced to the X-jaw face angle not matching beam divergence. After the problem was identified and the jaws were realigned by manufacture's engineers and all beams were re-steered to a symmetric shape at collimator 0° and verified at collimator 90° and 270°.
resultsPrior to the manufacturer adjusting the jaw face angles, the maximum observed electron beam symmetry changes with 90° collimator rotation were 2.0% and 2.6% for linac 1 and linac 2, respectively. After realigning, the jaw face angles the maximum observed electron beam symmetry changes with 90° collimator rotation were within 1.0% for all beams on both linacs.
conclusionWe have demonstrated that changes in symmetry of high energy electron beam with 90° collimator rotation can signal that the jaw face angle is not properly aligned with beam divergence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.