ArticleJournal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence2025
How parents leverage guilt and pride: A comparison of parental guilt and pride induction in Hong Kong and the United States.
Article in Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How parents leverage guilt and pride: A comparison of parental guilt and pride induction in Hong Kong and the United States.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Parental socialization of self-conscious emotions is crucial in shaping children's behaviors and moral development. While research has frequently examined the socialization of negative emotions like guilt, the socialization of positive emotions such as pride remains understudied. This gap limits our understanding of the outcomes and cultural differences in parental socialization of self-conscious emotions. Additionally, current research often fails to consider domain differences in the socialization of self-conscious emotions despite evidence indicating varying levels of perceived legitimacy and acceptance by adolescents, leading to a restricted understanding of their connection with parent-child relationships. Our study investigated the association between adolescents' perceptions of parents' pride and guilt induction across different domains (i.e., moral, conventional, prudential, and personal) and adolescents' perceptions of parent-child relationship quality in the United States (N = 142) and Hong Kong (N = 124). The domain-differentiated guilt and pride induction scales demonstrated scalar invariance, indicating consistent meaning and structure across both cultural groups. Results revealed both cultural similarities and differences. In both cultures, guilt induction on personal issues was negatively associated with relationship quality, while perceived levels of pride induction across all issue types were positively associated with relationship satisfaction. However, perceived levels of guilt induction on other issues were negatively associated with relationship quality only in the US sample. The results suggest cultural similarities and differences in how adolescents perceive their parents' use of guilt and pride induction. Our study emphasizes the significance of examining the socialization of positive self-evaluation emotions, like pride, and the need to differentiate between various domains in emotion socialization research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.