Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41373038›Full record

ArticleBMC zoology2025

From dispenser to nest: collection of fumigated material repels parasites across behavioural traits in Darwin's finches.

Lauren K Common, Sonia Kleindorfer, Andrew C Katsis, Katherine Albán Morales, Dominique M E Quirola, Birgit Fessl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC zoology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Good guardian, bad parent: tradeoffs between territory defense and parental care in Darwin's finches.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauren K CommonKonrad Lorenz Research Center for Behavior and Cognition, core facility of the University of Vienna, Grünau im Almtal, 4645, Austria. lauren.common@univie.ac.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8551-5107
Sonia KleindorferKonrad Lorenz Research Center for Behavior and Cognition, core facility of the University of Vienna, Grünau im Almtal, 4645, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5130-3122
Andrew C KatsisKonrad Lorenz Research Center for Behavior and Cognition, core facility of the University of Vienna, Grünau im Almtal, 4645, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4177-3096
Katherine Albán MoralesKonrad Lorenz Research Center for Behavior and Cognition, core facility of the University of Vienna, Grünau im Almtal, 4645, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2954-5824
Dominique M E QuirolaCharles Darwin Research Station, Charles Darwin Foundation, Puerto Ayora, Santa Cruz, Galápagos, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4618-0435
Birgit FesslCharles Darwin Research Station, Charles Darwin Foundation, Puerto Ayora, Santa Cruz, Galápagos, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1260-6002

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the midst of a biodiversity crisis, it is important to conserve diversity at all levels, including species, genetic, and behavioural diversity. Animals with different behavioural traits can interact with their environment in distinct ways; hence, the distribution of behavioural traits within a population can influence the efficacy and outcome of conservation interventions. On the Galápagos Islands, Darwin’s finches are threatened by an invasive parasite, the avian vampire fly, Philornis downsi. Avian vampire fly larvae develop in the base of the nest, where they feed on the blood and tissue of developing nestlings, causing high mortality. In this study on Floreana Island, we deployed dispensers filled with insecticide-treated nesting material, a conservation method that has been found to decrease parasite load and increase fledging success. We then assessed whether individual differences in Darwin’s finch neophilia (response to a novel object) and aggressiveness (response to a simulated territory intrusion) affected their use of treated material. We found that ~57% of nests contained treated nesting material and that increasing volumes of treated material were associated with decreased parasite load. We found no effect of neophilia or aggressiveness on the probability of using treated material or amount of treated material used. Our results support nesting material dispensers as an effective conservation measure that conserves the full range of behavioural responses. To increase the efficacy of this method, future research should consider species- and individual-level preferences for material type and dispenser location.

Indexed as

Avian vampire flyConservationEctoparasiteInvasive species controlPasseriformes: thraupidaePhilornis downsi

Identifiers

PMID41373038
PMCPMC12703940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.