ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2025
Imaging blood to periarterial CSF flow coupling using 4D flow MRI and an ultra-high-performance head-only gradient system.
Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flow 2.0: A Standardized Toolbox for Real-Time Phase-Contrast MRI of Neurofluid Dynamics.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- In-silico solute transport via perivascular networks in the human intracranial space.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Simultaneous Assessment of Intracranial Artery and Paravascular CSF Pulsation Using 3D Whole-Brain Diffusion-Prepared Cine bSSFP (DECAF) MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Cerebrospinal fluid mechanics across CNS barriers: from production, circulation, and clearance to mechanomedicine.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeriarterial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow has been hypothesized to contribute to brain waste clearance but is poorly understood. Animal studies suggest arterial pulsatility drives perivascular CSF in the direction of cerebral arterial blood flow (CBF), but human validation has relied on MRI approaches that do not inform on flow-directionality. Here, we use a high-performance gradient system enabling low velocity encoding (Venc) 4D flow MRI, to characterize cardiac-driven periarterial CSF flow and CBF-to-CSF flow coupling.
methodsHealthy participants (N = 10) underwent high resolution (0.8 mm isotropic) 4D flow MRI of blood (Venc = 120 cm/s) and CSF (Venc = 1.0 cm/s) on a 3.0T head-only system (MAGNUS, GE Healthcare; Gmax = 300mT/m, Smax = 750T/m/s). Images were reconstructed using local low rank (LLR) constrained parallel imaging and background field corrected using iterative, complex domain fitting. Luminal blood and associated periarterial CSF waveforms were extracted along the left and right anterior (ACA A1), middle (MCA M1 and M2), and posterior (PCA P2) cerebral arteries using a centerline approach, and characterized individually by amplitude and stroke volume and jointly by coupling coefficients from maximum cross-correlation ([Formula: see text]) and time-lags.
resultsFor low Venc 4D flow MRI, MAGNUS dramatically reduced the echo time and temporal resolution compared to whole-body systems. CBF and CSF measurements were successful in 61/80 locations (up to 8 per participant) with 19 measurements excluded due to velocity aliasing and/or poor local quality of the flow data. Inverse (anti-correlated) CBF-to-CSF coupling ([Formula: see text]) was observed for most segments (56/61), with strong coupling observed for all vessels, including M1 (-0.85 ± 0.06), A1 (-0.80 ± 0.12), P2 (-0.79 ± 0.08), and M2 (-0.78 ± 0.08). Further, CBF preceded CSF for most (43/56) segments, with short CBF-to-CSF lags in A1 (5.30 ± 64 ms) and P2 (4.13 ± 63 ms), higher in M1 (43 ± 39 ms), and highest in M2 (115 ± 39 ms). CBF and CSF flow metrics were also correlated in terms of flow rate amplitude (r = 0.40, p = 0.015) and stroke volume (r = 0.56, p < 0.001).
conclusionsHigh-performance gradient systems facilitate 4D flow imaging of very slow CSF. Joint analysis of CBF and periarterial CSF allowed assessment of CBF-to-CSF dynamics coupling. For most vessels, an inverse coupling and a positive time-lag was found from CBF to periarterial CSF, suggesting that the systolic arterial expansion drives CSF backwards and inwards again during diastolic relaxation. The proposed approach can be used to improve our understanding of CBF and CSF dynamics in aging and dementia. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.