Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372961›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2025

Repetitive negative thinking in adolescence: a mixed methods study.

Nikki N Huang, Michelle L Moulds, Jill M Newby, Aliza Werner-Seidler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nikki N HuangSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2033, Australia. nikki.huang@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8081-8595
Michelle L MouldsSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2033, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7064-4248
Jill M NewbySchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2033, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6473-9811
Aliza Werner-SeidlerSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2033, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9046-6159

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1197074National Health and Medical Research Council 2008839National Health and Medical Research Council 2024796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescence is a critical window for preventing common mental disorders. Repetitive negative thinking (RNT) is a transdiagnostic process contributing to depression and anxiety and a key prevention target. However, little is known about adolescent experiences of RNT, especially during early adolescence. Furthermore, co-rumination, the interpersonal analogue of RNT, remains underexamined. This study characterised diverse facets of adolescent RNT and co-rumination in a self-selected community sample with elevated depression and anxiety symptoms, incorporating adolescent and parental perspectives.

methodsA mixed‑methods online survey was completed by 72 adolescents (mean age = 14.51 years; 69% female, 10% non‑binary), including 26 younger (aged 10–14) and 46 older adolescents (aged 15–18), and 57 parents (adolescent mean age = 12.25 years; 44% female). Participants answered open- and close-ended questions regarding key aspects of adolescent RNT, and completed standardised measures of adolescent RNT, co‑rumination, depression, anxiety, wellbeing, and quality of life. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively; qualitative data were analysed using thematic coding.

resultsBoth younger and older adolescents reported comparable levels of elevated RNT, co-rumination, depression and anxiety, moderate wellbeing, and low-to-moderate quality of life, broadly consistent with parental reports. Qualitative responses were mostly consistent across adolescent age groups. Adolescents showed comprehensive understanding of worry but low conceptual familiarity with rumination, especially among younger adolescents. RNT was primarily past-focused, verbal, and most likely to occur at night, interfering with sleep. Older adolescents reported slightly longer and more frequent RNT episodes than younger adolescents. Across both age groups, common RNT triggers included being alone or in a quiet environment, interpersonal/social, and school-related triggers. Younger adolescents were less able to identify specific RNT triggers. Common RNT-reduction strategies included distraction and interacting with others. However, almost half of adolescents were unsure what triggered their RNT and reported not doing anything to stop it. Most adolescents and parents perceived RNT as entirely unhelpful or purposeless. RNT reduction was expected to improve emotional wellbeing and engagement in valued actions.

conclusionRNT and co-rumination are commonly experienced in adolescence. RNT causes distress to young people often lacking in effective coping strategies and warrants further attention alongside co-rumination as transdiagnostic targets in preventive mental health programs.

Indexed as

AdolescenceCo-ruminationMixed methodsQualitativeRepetitive negative thinkingRuminationWorry

Identifiers

PMID41372961
PMCPMC12801832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.