ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Monitoring wheelchair propulsion patterns: feasibility and validity of using wearable sensors.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, there is a need to understand the characteristics of manual wheelchair propulsion patterns in the daily life of users and the impact of these patterns on repetitive strain injury of the shoulders. This study aimed to develop a method for remote and long-term monitoring of wheelchair propulsion techniques. We used a hand-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU) to identify propulsion patterns in manual wheelchair users. IMU data was collected from 12 participants (7 males and 5 females), including 8 experienced and 4 inexperienced manual wheelchair users. We applied continuous wavelet transform (CWT) for feature extraction and used Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) Neural Network for pattern classification. SVM with a linear kernel achieved 89% accuracy, 78% F1-score, 78% precision, and 78% recall. SVM with a polynomial kernel achieved 94% accuracy, 88% F1-score, 88% precision, and 89% recall, while the MLP reached 95% accuracy, 89% F1-score, 89% precision, and 89% recall. Neither the participants’ wheelchair experience nor their gender significantly affected the performance of the classifiers. These findings suggest that the proposed IMU and propulsion patterns classification method can be used across different user profiles for remote and long-term monitoring of wheelchair propulsion patterns to better understand shoulder overuse risk in daily life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.