Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372958›Full record

ReviewJournal of cheminformatics2025

Machine learning to predict food effects during drug development: a comprehensive review.

Alam Shah, Fulin Bi, Jin Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alam ShahCenter of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Fulin BiCenter of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Jin YangCenter of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China. Cpu_yj@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug absorption can be altered due to the consumption of food, impacting the efficacy and safety of the drug administered, and predicting food effects (FE) can be quite complex. Traditional methods, including in vitro and in vivo models, fail to predict the full range of food-drug interactions owing to the biological variability of the gastrointestinal system. This review evaluates the predictive ability and accuracy of machine learning (ML) in predicting FE in comparison to conventional methods. We consider how ML models use food dataset information and assist in enhancing the formulation and dosing of the drugs. We discussed recent trends in FE prediction, its mechanisms, and effects on drug bioavailability. Supervised and unsupervised learning, as well as reinforcement learning, are analyzed in the context of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME) forecasting and drug development. ML is certainly useful in addressing the issues posed by traditional methods; however, challenges about data quality, model generalizability, and integration into the drug development process are obstacles that must be overcome. This review explains how other emerging technologies, for example, PBPK modeling, can be combined with ML to enhance its prospects in the field of drug development. We examined prospects of deep learning, explainable artificial intelligence (AI), and ethical and legal aspects of applying ML in pharmacokinetics, as well as the interdisciplinary approaches that are required to improve patient care outcomes.

Indexed as

ADME propertiesFood effectMachine learningPhysiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelingSupport vector machines

Identifiers

PMID41372958
PMCPMC12801895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.