Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372947›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025

Effects of lower limb neural mobilisation on reactive agility, balance, and physical performance: a randomised controlled trial.

Selim Mahmut Gunay, Ece Erturk

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06951048 (The Effects of Lower Extremity Neural Mobilization Techniques on Muscle Strength and Performance in Healthy Individuals), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06951048 nacompletednot on this map

The Effects of Lower Extremity Neural Mobilization Techniques on Muscle Strength and Performance in Healthy Individuals

TypeinterventionalSponsorUludag UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsHealty Volunteers, Sedantary, Young, FemaleArmsGroup I (Neural Mobilization), Group II (Neural Mobilization + Dynamic Stretching), Group III (Dynamic Stretching Only)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Selim Mahmut GunayDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey. selimmahmut.gunay@mku.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7550-5244
Ece ErturkDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2737-3441

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeural mobilization (NM) is commonly applied to enhance neural tissue mobility and reduce pain, but its effects on physical performance in healthy individuals remain uncertain. This randomised controlled trial investigated the effects of lower limb NM, applied alone or in combination with dynamic stretching, on reactive agility (RA), balance, flexibility, and muscle strength in healthy young women. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty healthy female participants were randomly assigned to three groups: the NM group, the NM + dynamic stretching (NMDS) group, and the dynamic stretching only (DS) group. Interventions were performed three times per week for two weeks under physiotherapist supervision. Performance was assessed using the RA test and vertical jump, while dynamic balance was evaluated with the Y balance test. In addition, hamstring flexibility and lower extremity isometric muscle strength were measured.

resultsResults showed significant main effects of time across all parameters (p < 0.05), with large effect sizes for balance, flexibility, and muscle strength. Notably, the NMDS group demonstrated superior improvements in Y Balance Test performance (F(2,57) = 8.83; p < 0.001; η²=0.237) compared with NM and DS. Hamstring flexibility also improved most prominently in the NMDS group, with a 21% increase. Although RA, vertical jump, and muscle strength improved within all groups, no significant group × time interactions were detected for these measures (p > 0.05). No adverse events occurred.

conclusionThese findings support the use of NM, especially when integrated with dynamic stretching, as a safe and effective intervention for enhancing neuromotor control, performance optimisation, and injury risk reduction in healthy individuals.

trial registrationNCT06951048; Registration date: 22 April 2025; ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06951048 ).

Indexed as

BalanceDynamic stretchingFlexibilityNeural mobilisationReactive agility

Identifiers

PMID41372947
PMCPMC12764030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.