ArticleSystematic reviews2025
Living alone with dementia is a neglected source of inequality: findings from a scoping review of research evidence.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring representation of people without cohabiting carers in research on help-seeking for dementia diagnosis: a scoping review protocol.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith growing proportions of single-person households, increasing numbers of people with dementia are living alone, challenging the still-prevalent assumption that people have an informal carer available. We aimed to characterise the research literature on people living alone with dementia and summarise what is known about their characteristics and needs.
methodThis scoping review followed Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. Seven databases (PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Ageline, EMBASE, PsycInfo, Social Policy and Practice) were searched for English-language publications on 18/01/2024, without date limits. Eligible studies reported on people with dementia living alone, using any research design; reviews, editorials, and conference abstracts were excluded. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened independently. Data were extracted using structured forms and summarised narratively, grouping quantitative findings descriptively and qualitative findings thematically.
resultsWe included 200 articles (162 quantitative, 38 qualitative) from 161 studies. Living alone was the primary focus in 30.5% of articles, living situation was explored in secondary comparisons or sub-group analyses in 62.5%, and noted only in describing samples in 7%. Most research (80.1%) was from Europe or North America. The first study was published in 1962 and the next in 1984, since when the annual number of publications has gradually increased. Across studies, people living alone with dementia were commonly described as older, more often female, and as experiencing significant unmet need. Reports noted variation in the extent of informal support, with some people receiving little or no support. Compared with those living with others, people living alone were often described as having less timely diagnosis, lower access to formal services, higher home care costs, and greater likelihood of moving into residential care or dying outside the home. Studies commonly reported social isolation, loneliness, and difficulties with daily living in people living alone with dementia. Family members providing support at a distance were described as receiving little assistance. Few studies examined approaches to addressing these needs or improving support.
conclusionsThis review highlights living alone with dementia as a growing but neglected source of inequality. Practical steps are needed now to address this issue in policy, service provision, practice and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.