ArticleReproductive health2025
Exploring attitudes toward fertility and childbearing among married women in Kabul, Afghanistan: a qualitative study.
Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Afghanistan faces persistently high maternal mortality, high fertility, and low use of modern contraceptives-trends at risk of worsening under current restrictions on women's mobility, education, and access to health services. Although family planning is a cost-effective strategy in high-fertility, low-resource settings, generating demand has long remained a challenge in Afghanistan. While socio-cultural barriers to family planning are well documented, limited evidence captures how women themselves interpret and negotiate fertility and childbearing within these constraints. This study explored married women's attitudes toward fertility and childbearing in Kabul to inform locally appropriate approaches to strengthening reproductive well-being. Methods In 2024, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 married women aged 20-43 years (mean = 32.1) in Kabul, Afghanistan, purposively selected for demographic diversity. Interviews were audio-recorded when possible or otherwise documented in detailed notes, and analyzed concurrently in MAXQDA 2024, with data collection continued until no new codes or insights emerged across three successive interviews. Results Five major categories were identified: (1) socio-cultural norms and expectations, (2) religious and ethical perspectives, (3) economic and functional dimensions of childbearing, (4) health and well-being considerations, and (5) emotional and psychological motivations. Across interviews, pronatalist norms and expectations for early and repeated childbearing remained dominant and were reinforced by misconceptions about contraception. Nevertheless, some women emphasized maternal health, child well-being, and more balanced decision-making within families-reflecting a diversity of reproductive perspectives within the prevailing social context. Conclusions Women's fertility attitudes reflected the coexistence of enduring pronatalist expectations with value-oriented considerations emphasizing maternal and child well-being. These perspectives illustrate nuanced forms of reproductive reasoning that may inform culturally responsive approaches to reproductive health promotion. Future research should examine how such orientations vary across Afghan settings. Within the current social constraints, discreet and context-appropriate counseling integrated into existing maternal and child health services could help support informed fertility decisions and contribute to safer maternal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.