ArticleMalaria journal2025
Understanding perceptions of malaria control measures in Burundi: a qualitative descriptive study using a socio-ecological approach.
Article in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Burundi, malaria remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality and persists as a major public health problem despite control strategies implemented nationally since 2000. While some quantitative studies have evaluated specific interventions, qualitative research examining the perceptions and practices of target populations regarding prevention measures is lacking. Such research is particularly important in the current context, where multiple control strategies are simultaneously implemented, potentially leading to confusion or reluctance among the population to adhere to prevention measures.
methodsA qualitative descriptive study was conducted from March to May 2023 in the health districts of Kinyinya and Ryansoro, combining 60 individual interviews and 28 focus group discussions (FGDs). The sample consisted primarily of farmers, with a slight female predominance (53% for individual interviews, 57.5% for FGDs). The collected data underwent thematic content analysis using a socio-ecological approach.
resultsThe study explored participants' perceptions and practices regarding four major interventions: distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), indoor residual spraying (IRS), intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp-SP), and environmental management. The study identified factors influencing malaria prevention behaviours across three main interconnected levels: intrapersonal (perceived needs and adverse effects), organizational (information dissemination and hygiene conditions at healthcare facilities), and policy/environmental (need for context-sensitive adaptation of interventions and addressing socio-economic constraints).
conclusionEffective malaria prevention in Burundi requires a multifaceted approach addressing communication needs, contextual adaptation, management of adverse effects, understanding of local priorities, and socio-economic constraints. Integrating these five dimensions into programme design and adapting prevention messages accordingly would significantly improve both acceptance and effectiveness of malaria control interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.