ArticleBMC cancer2025
Construction and validation of a recurrence prediction model for lung adenocarcinoma after treatment integrating radiomics features and clinical indicators.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Single-cell atlas reveals a pro-metastatic RELB+ neutrophil-myeloid subset underlying lymph node metastasis in EGFR-wildtype LUAD.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the feasibility and clinical value of constructing a predictive model for post-treatment recurrence risk in lung adenocarcinoma based on radiomics features (including texture and morphological features extracted from pretreatment chest CT images) and clinical indicators (age, gender, smoking history, pathological type, tumor-node-metastasis [TNM] stage, and tumor markers: carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA] and cytokeratin 19 fragment [CYFRA21-1]).
methodsA total of 350 lung adenocarcinoma patients who underwent standardized treatment from January 2020 to September 2024 were retrospectively enrolled and randomly divided into a training set (n = 245) and a validation set (n = 105) in a 7:3 ratio. Clinical data, pretreatment chest CT radiomics features, and tumor marker levels were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors, followed by the construction of a nomogram model. The model’s performance was evaluated and validated.
resultsThe recurrence rates were 33.11% (74/245) in the training set and 33.33% (35/105) in the validation set. Multivariate regression analysis showed that radiomics features (entropy and long axis ratio), TNM stage (III-IV), CEA level (≥ 5 ng/mL), and smoking history were independent risk factors (P < 0.05). The nomogram model demonstrated C-index values of 0.901 and 0.831 in the training and validation sets, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) values for predicting post-treatment recurrence were 0.901 (95% CI: 0.854–0.948) and 0.831 (95% CI: 0.732–0.930) in the training and validation sets, with sensitivities of 0.846 and 0.682, specificities of 0.860 and 0.840, precision-recall AUCs of 0.886 and 0.812, positive predictive values of 0.821 and 0.793, and negative predictive values of 0.879 and 0.785, respectively. Calibration curves indicated good agreement between predicted and observed recurrence, supported by Hosmer-Lemeshow test P-values of 0.743 and 0.709.
conclusionThe nomogram model incorporating radiomics features and clinical indicators effectively predicts the risk of post-treatment recurrence in lung adenocarcinoma, offering a practical tool for personalized follow-up and intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.