Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372920›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Construction and validation of a recurrence prediction model for lung adenocarcinoma after treatment integrating radiomics features and clinical indicators.

Ruomin Liao, Yi Zhang, Gang Li

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ruomin LiaoRespiatory Department, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai city, China.
Yi ZhangThoracic Surgery Department, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai city, China.
Gang LiUltrasound Department, Shanghai General Hospital, No.650, Xinsongjiang Road, Songjiang District, Shanghai city, 201620, China. gangli3021@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the feasibility and clinical value of constructing a predictive model for post-treatment recurrence risk in lung adenocarcinoma based on radiomics features (including texture and morphological features extracted from pretreatment chest CT images) and clinical indicators (age, gender, smoking history, pathological type, tumor-node-metastasis [TNM] stage, and tumor markers: carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA] and cytokeratin 19 fragment [CYFRA21-1]).

methodsA total of 350 lung adenocarcinoma patients who underwent standardized treatment from January 2020 to September 2024 were retrospectively enrolled and randomly divided into a training set (n = 245) and a validation set (n = 105) in a 7:3 ratio. Clinical data, pretreatment chest CT radiomics features, and tumor marker levels were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors, followed by the construction of a nomogram model. The model’s performance was evaluated and validated.

resultsThe recurrence rates were 33.11% (74/245) in the training set and 33.33% (35/105) in the validation set. Multivariate regression analysis showed that radiomics features (entropy and long axis ratio), TNM stage (III-IV), CEA level (≥ 5 ng/mL), and smoking history were independent risk factors (P < 0.05). The nomogram model demonstrated C-index values of 0.901 and 0.831 in the training and validation sets, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) values for predicting post-treatment recurrence were 0.901 (95% CI: 0.854–0.948) and 0.831 (95% CI: 0.732–0.930) in the training and validation sets, with sensitivities of 0.846 and 0.682, specificities of 0.860 and 0.840, precision-recall AUCs of 0.886 and 0.812, positive predictive values of 0.821 and 0.793, and negative predictive values of 0.879 and 0.785, respectively. Calibration curves indicated good agreement between predicted and observed recurrence, supported by Hosmer-Lemeshow test P-values of 0.743 and 0.709.

conclusionThe nomogram model incorporating radiomics features and clinical indicators effectively predicts the risk of post-treatment recurrence in lung adenocarcinoma, offering a practical tool for personalized follow-up and intervention strategies.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungLung NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenFemaleHumansKeratin-19MaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNomogramsRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenKeratin-19Diagnostic modelLaboratory indicatorsLung adenocarcinoma treatmentModel validationRadiology

Identifiers

PMID41372920
PMCPMC12821257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.