ReviewBMC women's health2025
Incidental finding of endometrial carcinoma in a first-trimester miscarriage mimicking molar pregnancy: a case report and review of literature.
Review in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndometrium cancer is the most common gynecological cancer in women from developed countries. However, endometrial cancer is rarely seen during pregnancy. In literature, there are 34 cases reported since 1996 and majority were detected in the first trimester. We present a case of endometrial carcinoma in the background of suspected molar pregnancy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 39-year-old gravida 3 para 1 lady presented at 5 weeks and 3 days amenorrhea with per vaginal bleeding in Dec 2022. Her serum beta-HCG was 14,634 IU/L and the ultrasound pelvis showed echogenic material in the endometrial cavity with no gestational sac. A follow-up serum beta-HCG at 48 h showed a suboptimal rise to 22,546 IU/L. Findings on a repeat ultrasound pelvis were suspicious of a molar pregnancy. She underwent evacuation of uterus. The histology showed focal well differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma with background hyperplasia with and without atypia. Products of conception were also confirmed. Staging scans confirmed radiological stage 1 disease. She declined fertility sparing treatment and opted for definitive surgery. She underwent a total laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy. The final histology showed complex atypical hyperplasia with no residual endometrial adenocarcinoma. The patient recovered well and remained disease-free 21 months after surgery.
conclusionSuspicious radiological findings in early pregnancy should prompt meticulous histological evaluation to rule out malignancy. Although endometrial cancer is very rare in pregnancy, it is important for clinicians and pathologists to have high index of suspicion of this possible differential diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.