ArticleBMC palliative care2025
Effect of implementing clinical guidelines for treatment of symptoms in advanced cancer patients in specialist palliative care: a nationwide register-based study.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is limited evidence on whether the implementation of clinical guidelines has a positive effect on the symptomatology of cancer patients in palliative care. A large national project conducted 2017-2019 aimed to improve the quality of life of cancer patients by implementing clinical guidelines for severe pain, dyspnea, constipation and depression in Danish specialist palliative care. We investigated how pain, dyspnea, constipation and depression changed from the start of palliative care to 1-4 weeks later and whether changes were associated with timing of guideline implementation and with receipt of treatment according to guidelines.
methodsA prospective, national quality improvement study. Data for the project was obtained from the Danish Palliative Care Database. We included adult patients with advanced cancer who answered the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnire-Core-15-Palliative Care (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL) questionnaire at the start of specialist palliative care and 1–4 weeks later. Multiple linear regression evaluated associations between changes in symptom severity and timing of guideline implementation and receiving treatment according to guidelines.
resultsOf 4,640 patients completing both EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaires, 3,879 (84%) qualified for one or more treatment guidelines. Pain, dyspnea, constipation and depression improved significantly. Timing of guideline implementation and receiving treatment according to guidelines were not associated with improvement, except for dyspnea, where small associations were observed.
conclusionsPatients reported improved pain, dyspnea, constipation and depression, but this improvement was not consistently associated with the implementation of the four guidelines in palliative care. The lack of impact may be attributed to a modest impact on clinical practice or the observational project design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.