ArticleBMC primary care2025
Do I need to know my patient's sexual orientation and gender identity? Insights from Swiss primary care physicians.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrimary care physicians (PCPs) play a pivotal role in the Swiss healthcare system, serving as the first point of contact for diverse populations, including sexual and gender minorities (SGM). The collection and use of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) information is increasingly recognized in public health as a tool to address health inequities. This study explores PCPs' perspectives, practices, and perceived relevance of collecting, documenting, and using SOGI information in Swiss primary care.
methodsSemi-structured interviews with 11 PCPs in German-speaking Switzerland were conducted. The data were analysed via a hybrid thematic analysis approach that combined inductive and deductive coding, guided by the minority stress model and a health equity perspective.
resultsThe PCPs generally acknowledged the relevance of SOGI information in specific clinical contexts, particularly mental and sexual health; however, they saw limited relevance in routine care. Documentation practices were inconsistent, often informal, and constrained by binary electronic systems. Open communication was described as a facilitator, although discomfort and fear of stigmatization limited proactive inquiry. SOGI is often framed in behavioural rather than identity terms. Most participants had received little to no formal training on SGM health and expressed ambivalence about the need for further education. Structural barriers, assumptions, and lack of visibility of SGM patients further contributed to the limited use of the SOGI in clinical decision-making.
conclusionDespite the growing awareness of the SOGI as a social determinant of health, it is still rarely addressed in Swiss primary care. Addressing documentation barriers, promoting inclusive communication, and embedding SOGI-related information in medical education are critical steps toward equitable, patient-centred care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.