ArticleBMC primary care2025
'Obviously, you can't outright ask': what are the barriers and facilitators to discussion of spiritual health within social prescribing? A study using semi-structured interviews.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "We Don't Normally Go Down This Avenue; This Is Normally Taboo": Using Co-Design to Develop a Training Intervention for Spiritual Health in Primary Care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSocial prescribing aims to provide holistic care to patients and meet needs that expand beyond the biomedical model. Holistic care includes spiritual health. However, the understanding of social prescribers' attitudes towards discussing spiritual health with their patients is limited. This study aimed to understand how spiritual health currently fits into social prescribing and explore barriers and facilitators to incorporating spiritual health within social prescribing practice.
methodTwelve social prescribers were interviewed online, using semi-structured interviews. These interviews were an hour long and covered aspects of spiritual health within social prescribing, as well as barriers and facilitators to the discussion of spiritual health within social prescribing. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the interviews by three researchers.
resultsCurrently, social prescribers use community faith-based organisations mainly for non-spiritual holistic support, especially around practical items. They identified an overlap and limited differentiation between spiritual health and mental health. When a patient discloses spiritual health needs, social prescribers felt they were open to helping patients access help. Barriers and facilitators to the discussion of spiritual health included: viewing religion as a sensitive topic and a subsequent fear of 'deep conversations'; concern about harm or offence to vulnerable patients; social prescribers' comfort and confidence with the topic being part of their role, as well as discordance/concordance with patient beliefs.
conclusionsSocial prescribers appeared very open to the topic of spiritual health; however many felt more confident with non-traditional-Western spiritual activities such as yoga or meditation, and using community faith-based organisations for non-spiritual support. Bespoke training for those in primary care could address barriers to the inclusion of spiritual health in primary care, but a systemic cultural approach is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.