Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41372804›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025

Diagnostic significance of cardiac bridging integrator 1 score in hospitalized patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and its assessment of prognostic value for major adverse cardiac events.

Xia Guo, Haoxuan Chu, Hanchi Xu, Zhen Guo, Yulin Tian, Shipeng Wang, Yushi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xia Guo *Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Haoxuan Chu *Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Hanchi XuDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Zhen GuoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Yulin TianDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Shipeng WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Yushi WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China. yushi@jlu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac bridging integrator 1 (cBIN1) is a cardiomyocyte-specific protein critical for excitation-contraction coupling. The cBIN1 score (CS), derived from plasma cBIN1 levels, serves as a non-invasive biomarker reflecting myocardial microstructural integrity and is unaffected by systemic inflammation or BMI.

methodsA total of 108 HFpEF patients and 108 matched controls were retrospectively included. All subjects underwent clinical evaluation, echocardiography, and biochemical testing. Plasma cBIN1 was measured by ELISA, and CS was calculated. Multivariate logistic regression and ROC analyses were used to assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of CS for HFpEF and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during 1-year follow-up. A sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding patients with chronic kidney disease or eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m² to address renal-related confounding.

resultsCS levels were significantly higher in the HFpEF group (p < 0.001). LVEF, E/e', neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), BNP, and CS were independently associated with HFpEF. CS showed positive correlations with BNP, sST2, left atrial diameter, and E/e', and a negative correlation with LVEF. ROC analysis yielded an AUC of 0.805 for CS in diagnosing HFpEF (sensitivity 70.4%, specificity69.4%, cutoff = 3.902). Diagnostic performance improved when CS was combined with BNP (AUC = 0.953) or sST2 (AUC = 0.834). During follow-up, patients with CS ≥ 3.902 had significantly increased MACE risk (OR = 4.318, p = 0.002), establishing CS as an independent prognostic marker. The sensitivity analysis confirmed these findings remained robust: CS retained independent diagnostic value for HFpEF and predictive value for MACE, with stable diagnostic performance of CS alone and in combination with BNP/sST2, and minimal variation in optimal cutoff.

conclusionCS is an independent diagnostic marker for HFpEF and predictor of MACE, correlating with established cardiac markers and echocardiographic parameters. Its diagnostic accuracy is significantly enhanced when combined with BNP or sST2, supporting its clinical utility in early diagnosis and risk stratification in HFpEF.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingHeart FailureHospitalizationStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBiomarkersBiomarkerBridging integrator 1CS scoreHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionMajor adverse cardiac events

Identifiers

PMID41372804
PMCPMC12801533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.