ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2025
Evaluating the predictive power of the body roundness index (BRI) versus traditional obesity measures for female infertility: a hybrid approach using regression models and machine learning algorithms on cross-sectional data.
Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Body Roundness Index (BRI) has recently been proposed as an effective metric for assessing obesity-related health risks, but its association with female infertility remains insufficiently studied. This study aims to evaluate the predictive power of BRI in comparison to traditional obesity measures (waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI)) for predicting female infertility using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). A total of 2962 women aged 18-45 years were included in this cross-sectional analysis. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to examine the relationship between BRI and infertility, adjusting for demographic, behavioral, and metabolic factors. In addition, Generalized Additive Models (GAM) and Restricted Cubic Spline (RCS) regression were used to investigate potential non-linear associations, and machine learning algorithms were applied to assess the predictive performance and identify significant features. Our results demonstrated a significant positive association between BRI and female infertility. In the fully adjusted model, each unit increase in BRI was associated with 18% higher odds of infertility (OR = 1.18, p = 0.032). A dose-response relationship was also observed across BRI quartiles, with women in the highest quartile (Q4) exhibiting 125% higher odds of infertility compared to those in the lowest quartile. Machine learning analysis further confirmed the robustness of BRI in predicting infertility risk, with the XGBoost model providing the highest area under the curve (AUC = 0.935). These findings highlight BRI as a superior predictor for female infertility compared to traditional obesity measures, suggesting its potential for improving clinical risk stratification in reproductive health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.